Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-04-06 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1132 HB 55 Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 5 : 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1133 HB 55 Page 10, line 17: Delete 24,925,200 Insert 24,829,220 Page 10, line 17: Delete 14,234,700 Insert 14,138,720 Page 10, line 18: Delete 537,100 Insert 441,120 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 5. Senator Taylor objected. Senator Pearce lifted the call. Senator Little called the Senate, then lifted the call. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 6 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Lincoln, Little, Salo Nays: Duncan, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1134 HB 55 Excused: Kerttula and so, Amendment No. 5 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 6 : Page 10, line 16: Delete 6,273,500 6,248,500 Insert 6,173,500 6,148,500 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 6. Senator Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 3 NAYS: 16 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Salo Nays: Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff Excused: Kerttula and so, Amendment No. 6 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 7 : 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1135 HB 55 Page 10, line 15: Delete 7,336,000 7,336,000 Insert 7,086,000 7,086,000 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 7. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 2 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley Nays: Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Kerttula, Leman, Lincoln, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Zharoff and so, Amendment No. 7 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 8 : Page 10, line 17: Delete 24,925,200 Insert 24,915,450 Delete 14,234,700 Insert 14,224,950 Page 10, line 18: Delete 537,100 Insert 527,350 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1136 HB 55 Adjust funding information accordingly. Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 8. Objections were heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Little, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 8 failed. Amendment No. 9 was not offered. Senator Salo offered Amendment No. 10 : Page 12, after line 13: Insert Community Schools 2,400.0 2,400.0 Senator Salo moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 10. Senator Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 10 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1137 HB 55 SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 10 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 10 failed. Senator Kerttula offered Amendment No. 11 : Page 34, line 31: Delete $3,737,600 Insert $3,835,400 Senator Kerttula moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 11. Senator Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 11 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 11 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1138 HB 55 Absent: Ellis and so, Amendment No. 11 failed. Senator Zharoff offered Amendment No. 12 : Page 24, line 21: Delete 12,947,600 7,170,600 Insert 13,117,600 7,340,600 Page 24, line 23: Delete 9,230,500 Insert 9,400,500 Senator Zharoff moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 12. Objections were heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 12 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 12 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 12 failed. Senators Duncan, Lincoln offered Amendment No. 13 : 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1139 HB 55 Page 5, line 14, after "the sum of" Delete 28,329,200 Insert 29,000,000 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 13. Senators Pearce, Kelly objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 13 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 13 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 13 failed. Senator Salo offered Amendment No. 14 : Page 11, line 7 & 10: Delete 11,605,400 11,147,400 Insert 11,705,400 11,247,000 Delete 5,643,700 Insert 5,743,700 Senator Salo moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 14. Senators Kelly, Taylor objected. 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1140 HB 55 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 14 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 14 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 14 failed. Senator Duncan, Kerttula, Little offered Amendment No. 15 : Page 10, line 8: Delete 12,512,300 5,744,400 Insert 12,812,300 6,044,400 Page 10, line 10: Delete 5,528,700 Insert 5,828,700 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 15. Senator Pearce objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 15 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 15 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1141 HB 55 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 15 failed. Senator Salo offered Amendment No. 16 : Page 32, line 35: Delete 866,400 866,400 Insert 959,700 959,700 Senator Salo moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 16. Senator Miller objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 16 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 16 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 16 failed. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 17 : 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1142 HB 55 Page 14, line 32: Insert 2136.3 GF Match 2136.6 Federal Insert 2898.5 Page 14, line 34: AFDC and Adult public assistance benefits rolled back to 1992 instead of 1991 for AFDC and 1990 for APA. Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 17. Senator Frank objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 17 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 17 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 17 failed. Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 18 : 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1143 HB 55 Page 12, line 13: Delete 48,925,700 3,290,300 45,635,400 Insert 49,000,600 3,365,200 45,635,400 Page 12, line 14: Delete 30,641,400 Insert 30,716,300 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 18. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 18 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 18 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 18 failed. Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 19 : Page 24, line 21: Delete 12,947,600 7,170,600 Insert 13,488,600 7,712,600 1993-04-06 Senate Journal Page 1144 HB 55 Page 24, line 23: Delete 9,230,500 Insert 9,771,500 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 19. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 19 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 55(RLS) Second Reading Amendment No. 19 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 19 failed.